Dr.
Johanna Rubba
English Department (Linguistics)
California Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo
Last
updated 1/2/12
ENGL
503: Graduate Introduction to Linguistics
INSTRUCTIONS
FOR TERM
PAPERS
READ
THIS ENTIRE PAGE CAREFULLY; PRINT IT OUT AND CONSULT IT FREQUENTLY AS YOU
WORK ON YOUR PAPER.
Note: More guidance is forthcoming: some general ideas for aspects
of language to analyze, and examples of term papers from previous quarters.
Preface: Interpreters of literature face the problem of subjectivity:
can a text mean whatever you want it to mean? Is one interpretation more defensible
than another? Defenses are often drawn from the biography and social context
of the writer, the period/style/school of the poem, dominant sociopolitical
themes of the writer's times, etc. Surely word choice and some aspects of structure
are brought in. However, absence of detailed and explicit knowledge of the
structural, contextual, and social uses of language can limit the defense
of an interpretation and open the interpreter to accusations of subjectivity
or of twisting the work to fit a social or ideological agenda. Being able to
point to very specific aspects of the text's language and apply concepts tried
and true in analysis of everyday language can provide a very solid foundation
for many aspects of an interpretation, and can also lead to a completely new,
different, richer, or clearer understanding of the work. I have taught full
courses in linguistic analysis of literature in the past with great success.
Students were awed by the value of linguistics as an interpretive tool, and
numerous students decided that such a course should be a requirement for English
majors. A good number of the (12-20-page) term papers they wrote for these
classes were publishable or had the seeds of a publishable analysis. With this
paper, you will have an opportunity to taste the usefulness of this particular
application of linguistics (which is called stylistics) to one of your
true loves: literature.
- Task: To apply concepts of linguistics in literary analysis
- Objective 1: To explore the relation between explicit knowledge of
language structure and use, and the defense of literary interpretation
- Objective 2: To demonstrate superior graduate-level skill in writing
formal English
- Specifics of task: Use aspects of the structure/use of language
in an excerpt of a literary text to develop and, importantly, defend an
analysis and interpretation of the text. See example abstracts of papers
below. If prose, the text should be between 1,000 and 1,500 words, in order
to be able to detect patterns. If drama, choose an act or scene of similar
length. A poem would be challenging, and success would depend very much on
the particular poem. Short poems can be very rich; long poems might better
reveal patterns, but be overwhelm in other ways. Think about choosing a poem
if you feel that you are understanding the material well in the first few
weeks of class, and, especially, if particular course topics bring one to
mind. You will have occasional homework exercises applying the current topic
to short pieces of literature of various genres.
- Content/organization requirements:
- The first part of your paper must introduce your "mission": What text
are you going to analyze; what linguistic aspect of the text are you
going to analyze; what is your analysis or interpretation of the text,
which you will defend using linguistic analysis? In
this first section, you should also bring in some brief information regarding
scholarship of others regarding your text, but this should be very sparse
-- just enough to give relevant background for your approach to the text.
Maximum 20% of your paper.
- The great bulk of your paper (at least 80%) must be devoted to your
analysis. When these papers are weak, it is usually because the student
adheres closely to a typical literary-analysis task, without bringing
in enough explicit and detailed linguistics. You have plenty of opportunities
in other classes to write the former kind of paper; this is intended
to be a VERY DIFFERENT experience.
- Style: writing style in linguistics has two main characteristics: (1)
the highest value is placed on conciseness and clarity,
not stylistic flair and prolixity (lots of words). Be as complete and
as detailed as you can in as few words as possible. (2) Linguistics articles
and books are rarely one, continuous piece of prose. They are divided
into sections, and frequently have subsections of the sections. This
is a requirement for your paper. You will see examples in the
model papers I put on Blackboard.
- Sources: You must cite in your text and
list in your Works Cited list at least FOUR scholarly sources. The text
you are analyzing must be in your reference list, but it does not count
as a scholarly source; hence, it does not count towards the four. The sources
must be peer-reviewed. Do not use Google Books or similar sites that give samples of
a book. The crucial bit you need may not be included in the sample. NOTE:
Our library has an extremely limited collection in current linguistics,
and probably next to nothing in stylistics. If you need books or articles
not available through Kennedy or through databases, use LINK+, which delivers
books much more quickly than Interlibrary Loan. Journal articles are delivered
by ILL electronically, and are therefore considerably more likely
than a book to arrive quickly.
- Grading: I do not grade on content alone. I
do not consider it a good idea to pass a graduate student out of an English
MA course if s/he does not have above-average writing skills, including
being able to use the language of the intellectual discourse community
proficiently. For those who aspire to a career teaching undergraduate
writing, these qualifications are paramount (despite what current trends
may favor). Organization
at the level of the paper, the section, the paragraph, and the sentence
is also taken into account, along with clarity of expression, sophistication
of sentence structure* (by which I mean structural variety and complexity,
not fancy wording), tone, and attention to formal grammar, formal usage,
and punctuation. A paper with excellent content, but with major flaws in
these other areas, will receive a grade considerably lower than that which
the content warrants. Editing
Tips, Editing
Tips, Editing
Tips.
*This includes effective information structure, which we will study a good
deal in the syntax and information structure portions of the course.
Schedule of dates:
- Tuesday, Jan. 24th: Hand in a short (1-1.5 page) Proposal in
which you describe either one text you have chosen or a small number of candidates,
the aspect of language in the text you will look at, and 1-3 ideas you have
for how you will analyze your text. Typed, submitted electronically in .doc
or .docx format (do NOT zip; and no PDFs. I will make comments using the
Word comment function). Follow the formatting requirements marked
§ in the list
below. Your submission must be sent to my Inbox by 4 pm that day. Do NOT miss
class because your proposal isn't finished.
- Between Feb. 6th and 16th: A required office visit to discuss
your paper. This should not be your only office visit, but is a minimum.
I will make available a calendar of appointments you can sign up for. If
you do not make this visit, you will lose 5% of your term paper grade,
- Thursday, Mar. 8th: Papers due. I will reserve three extensions.
You cannot request an extension until 8 am of the day the paper is due. First
come, first served, going by the date/time "stamp" of your e-mail message.
FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS
- Title page: At the top of your first page, either right- or left-justified,
put your name, the date, and the title of the course. Do not put
this on a separate cover page. NO report covers.
- § Two-sided copy: In the interests of saving trees and reducing
the weight of my "grading goods," I strongly encourage you to print
out your paper double-sided. Most printers have settings for this; if yours
doesn't, it's not difficult to figure out how to stack the paper so that
it comes out correctly on the second round of printing. Run trials.
- USE THIS CHECKLIST
as you prepare your paper. Check it again when working on your final draft.
Not conforming to these formatting requirements will cost you points.
- ____ I have examined and followed the project instructions on the relevant
course web pages.
- ____ The paper is divided into sections with subheadings;
it is not one, continuous essay.
- ____ My pages are numbered either in
the top right or lower right corner. §
- ____ My paper is double-spaced,
not 1.5 space. §
- ____ My margins are 1" all
around; no more, no less. §
- ____ My paper is about 10 pages long (minimum 8, maximum 12), excluding
bibliography and any appendices.
- ____ The
paper is in 12-point Times, Times Roman or Times New Roman font. (Use
of any other font is unacceptable; your paper will not be graded.) §
- ____
I do not skip a line between paragraphs; I indent new paragraphs. None
of my paragraphs takes up most or all of a page.
- ____ None of my graphics
(tables, charts, graphs, images) (if any) takes up more than a quarter
of a page. §
- ____ I have avoided "widows" and "orphans" (that
is, a page that ends with the single line of a new paragraph or with
a new section subtitle. Break to a new page if this is going to happen.
- ____ My bibliography is presented according to MLA format.
- ____
I have included an appendix if appropriate.*
- ____ I have visited Dr.
Rubba's Editing Tips page on her website and made sure my paper conforms
to the requirements given there. §
- ____ I have taken the paper through
at least two drafts and have carefully checked spelling, punctuation,
and grammar. I have used my own eyes as well as a spell-checker. (Do
not use grammar checkers. Half the time, their suggestions
are wrong).
* An appendix is appropriate if your work is short enough to append to the
paper, if you have done counts and want to present your full results along
with the summaries in the text proper, or if you need to write a longish synopsis
of the work your piece is taken from in order for the reader to understand
its context (e.g., a novel or short story).
Samples from former stylistics papers
These samples are from full-length papers (between 12 and 20 pages). Also,
they were written for a course which was devoted entirely to stylistics. Therefore,
they will look very ambitious to you, and rightly so. I include them here
to give you an idea of how linguistics can be applied in literary studies.
Your paper is to be more of an extended exercise than a paper of the sort
exemplified here. Copies of these papers will be made available on Blackboard.
"Bruised Lilies: Women and Flowers in Song’s 'Ikebana'"
"Understanding a poet’s use of metaphor is essential to interpreting
her poem. Poets use metaphor in various ways to explain, question, elaborate,
extend and connect ideas. Cathy Song employs all of these metaphorical deviation
strategies in her poem “Ikebana.” Through extending, elaborating,
questioning, and composing the conceptual metaphors WOMEN ARE FLOWERS and
WHITE IS PURITY, Song illuminates and questions societal expectations about
women. More specifically, Song uses the conceptual metaphors WOMEN ARE FLOWERS
and WHITE IS PURITY to introduce new metaphors that challenge both Japanese
and American cultural assumptions about female beauty standards; female roles
in society; female artificiality; female sexuality as a gift to males; male
force, sexual and otherwise; and the notion of white in connection with female
purity."
"Punctuation and Meaning: Stops and Clausal Adjuncts in Faulkner's Absalom,
Absalom!"
"This paper examines William Faulkner's written discourse presentation in
a randomly chosen, approximately 1730 word selection from Miss Rosa's story
as narrated by Quentin Compson in Absalom, Absalom! Punctuation is the
focus, specifically Faulkner's use of clausal adjuncts and other point indicators
(periods, commas, semicolons, dashes). Regularly occurring patterns as well
as deviations from standard text-grammar punctuation rules ... will be noted,
because these usually foreground discourse elements, inviting reader interpretation."
"Mountain Language and Turkey: A Study on [sic] Language Repression"
"The purpose of this paper is not to figure out why [atrocities such as the
Holocaust, Pol Pot's Killing Fields, and the like] occurred, but to explain
how language control and language repression play roles in these events ...
[t]he main emphasis in this play is the role of language and language policy
on [sic] a minority population, in this case the 'mountain language' speakers.
The 'state language' speakers deny the 'mountain language' speakers access
to their language. Those who speak the 'mountain language' are sent to prison
for failing to follow state policy ... [i]dentifying a minority population
through the language that they speak, Pinter exposes a strong link between
language and identity."
"Are These Actual Miles?"
For a class exercise intended to seek evidence of minimalism in
Raymond Carver's "Are These Actual Miles?", a student examined sentence structure
and lexicon (words) in the story, doing counts of occurring structures and
words in order to find patterns. Evidence of minimalism is found, but the student
makes a good argument against the notion that minimalism of form entails minimalism
of meaning or reader involvement:
- "Carver focuses our attention on [characters]
Toni and Leo through his minimal style. He has left much to the reader's
imagination, specifically elements which are not especially relevant to the
story itself. Another way of expressing this idea is to say that Carver relies
on the reader's use of inference to formulate the world which surrounds the
main story line. Carver also depends on the reader's use of inference in
creating emotionally intense scenes."
- "We, as readers, must rely on our knowledge of how it feels to wait for
something and then be disappointed in order to understand the emotional impact
of the scene ... [t]he scene invokes our frames of the emotional trauma of
rejection. Carver never tells us how Leo is reacting or feeling, and so we
must depend on our own experiences and situations we've witnessed to create
Leo's emotional state. We don't feel what Leo feels, but Leo feels what
we would feel if we were in his situation." [What she means here is that
the reader projects her/his own responses onto the character; this can trigger
a strong connection to the character and the story.]
- "Carver uses minimalist style to great effect ... through relating incidents
without much commentary, he trusts the reader's powers of inference to create
the emotional impact of the story."
To
my graduate grading standards To
503 home page