English Department (Linguistics)
Cal Poly State University San Luis Obispo
Last updated 4/19/11

© 2011 Johanna Rubba

ENGL 391: Topics in Applied Linguistics: Linguistics and Language Arts
Course Project: A Critique of State-Approved Language Arts Teaching Materials

Vocabulary Instruction


Plagiarism/cheating warning
NOTE: ALL FORMS OF CHEATING WILL RESULT IN LOWERING OF THE COURSE GRADE (INCLUDING A POSSIBLEGRADE OF F FOR THE COURSE) AND A REPORT TO THE OFFICE OF STUDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES. VISIT THEIR WEBSITE AND STUDY ALL OF ITS PAGES CAREFULLY. SERIOUS CHEATING CAN RESULT IN EXPULSION FROM CAL POLY. READ ALSO MY PLAGIARISM WARNING.


*Print this out and use it as a checklist; take it with you to the library or wherever you look at your materials.*

These instructions have four parts:
1) Detailed project instructions (on this page).
2) Formatting instructions. You will lose points if you do not follow these instructions.
3) Editing/Proofreading instructions.
You will lose points if you do not follow these instructions.
3) A copy of the rubric I use for grading your papers. Click here.

If at any point you have questions, definitely ask me for help. That's what I'm here for!

> MATERIAL TO EXAMINE:

Permitted grades: 4-8
Examine the Teacher's Annotated Edition (usually with a coil binder) and a Practice Book for the purpose of this paper. Examine the books and boxes devoted to your grade. If there is a special component devoted entirely to vocabulary work, include it.
Permitted publishers: Pearson, SRA, Houghton-Mifflin (pronounced hoe-ton), Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.

> TASKS:

Your paper will deal with five different vocabulary-expansion strategies. Your task is to compare how these are treated in the teaching materials you look at to the recommendations for sound vocabulary teaching made in class and in the readings. The five strategies are:

For each skill, answer these questions:

  1. Does the treatment of the strategy conform to recommendations for vocabulary instruction that were made in class?
  2. Include a photocopy of ONE lesson/activity for each topic 1-5. Refer to these samples in your paper; use them to illustrate how the package addresses the various skills. Attach these in the text of the paper after the relevant section. THESE DO NOT CONTRIBUTE TO YOUR PAGE COUNT; subtract them when figuring your page count.
  3. In your discussion, you MUST refer to/cite the relevant class lectures/readings to support your judgment. Not doing so will lower your grade considerably.

> PAPER STRUCTURE:

I     A very brief introduction; it can report the results of your evaluation in general terms. You write this last.
II    Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 evaluating the five strategies given above.
III  A brief conclusion on your findings, which may be somewhat repetitive.
IV  A reference list (bibliography). List only sources that you actually cite in the text, including the materials you examine. You MUST cite our class readings!!
Use a recognized format: MLA or APA. If you don't know what this means, many college writing manuals exist which can provide help; online resources include http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/05/ and http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/.


> FORMATTING INSTRUCTIONS     IF YOU DO NOT FOLLOW THESE INSTRUCTIONS, YOU WILL DEFINITELY LOSE POINTS!

PRINT THIS OUT AND USE IT AS A CHECKLIST:

> PROOFREADING AND EDITING

At whatever level you eventually teach or write in your career, you will be expected to conform to the current standards for formal grammar, spelling, punctuation, paragraph formatting, etc. Expectations are particularly high for language arts and English teachers. College professors vary a great deal in their expectations in this regard, but the state standards for both teachers and schoolchildren expect full compliance. I also expect full compliance.

 

 

 

 

Back to top of page